ArticleTrader.com
  

 Main Menu

  Home
  Member Login
  Forum
  Submit Article
  RSS Feeds
  Contact Us
  About

 Services

  Article Distribution
  Link Building

 Tools

  ArticleMS
  Directory Tracker

 Categories

  Automotive
  Business
  Computers
  Entertainment
  Finance
  Food
  Health
  Home and Family
  Internet
  Legal
  » Family law
  » Immigration
  » Personal Injury
  Science
  Self Improvement
  Shopping
  Society
  Sports
  Technology
  Travel
  Writing

100 users online.



 
  » Category Sponsors
  Get Your Link Here - Limited Time Bargain at only $14/month!

Home » Legal » Wrongful Death Suit involving Coal Carrier Colliding with Vessel
Article Stats:
4 Views
333 Words

Get Html Code
PDF | Print View | Post to your Site

Wrongful Death Suit involving Coal Carrier Colliding with Vessel

Submitted by adviatech2
Wed, 8 Jul 2009

A 29-year-old woman was working as a cook aboard a sailing vessel, the Essence. Early one morning, the Barkald, a bulk coal carrier with an estimated weight of nearly 49,500 deadweight tons, collided with the Essence. In the aftermath of the collision, the Essence became hung up broadside on the Barkald's bow. Crew members aboard the Essence were able to safely evacuate from the vessel to the water, but when the Essence broke free from the Barkald's bow and started to sink, the cook, an individual named Bortolott, was pulled underwater and drowned. She is survived by her parents.

Ms. Bortolotti had earned about $42,000 annually, and her estate claimed between $1.35 million and $1.99 million in lost earnings.

Bortolotti's parents, individually and on behalf of her estate, sued the shipping company that operated the Barkald, the pilot, the pilot's association, and the Essence's owner and pilot. Plaintiffs alleged the Barkald's crew failed to follow the proper safety measures appropriate to the circumstances. Plaintiffs claimed that a light was out portside on the coal carrier, limiting visibility as it navigated past the Essence. Plaintiff's also alleged that the vessel's master failed to obey the captain's order to post a lookout at the bow because of the vessel's size and crane obstructions on deck. Because no one was stationed at the bow, plaintiffs argued, no one was able to foresee the inevitable collision. Finally, it was alleged that the Essence failed to follow established rules associated with international navigation.

Defendants argued that their liability was restricted by the pecuniary loss rule under the Jones Act, under which there would be no loss because Bortolotti was without dependents.

Plaintiffs and defendants settled before trial for $5 million. The shipping company's insurer paid $3 million, and the Essence's insurer contributed the remainder. An intriguing aspect of this case is that it resembled a responsibility scenario often applicable to vehicle mishaps on land, in cases where a measure of blame is shared between defendants.

About the Author

Alexandra Reed writes for Connecticut personal injury law firm, Stratton Faxon. Contact Stratton Faxon to speak with a Connecticut accident lawyer about your personal injury, wrongful death, or Connecticut malpractice case. To learn more, visit Strattonfaxon.com.


Source: ArticleTrader.com
Creative Commons License

Comments

No comments posted.

Add Comment

Your Name:


Your Email:


Comment

Enter the code shown

Visual CAPTCHA

 Top Authors

 1 stickystebee (3019)
 2 alien82 (2756)
 3 kajuba (2254)
 4 limalan88 (2175)
 5 sverdlow (1712)
 6 juliet (1683)
 7 AnthonyF (1244)
 8 artavia.seo (1137)
 9 MarkeD (1086)
 10 isolvum (1019)
 11 cj (936)
 12 IC (935)
 13 jkhbraveheart (847)
 14 lets_j2top@ya.. (825)
 15 Osborne (794)
  » Member List

 Latest Forum

» Center my website
» Comment on pages
» Can't Review or Manage Pending Articles
» Manage Articles error
» How to change font size on home page and articles
» Hey Im new here

 Distribution

Article Distribution

  
  Affiliate Program 2Checkout.com, Inc. is an authorized retailer of ArticleTrader.com

1.34s